Husband Joseph Leavitt 1
Born: - Gilmanton, Belknap, NH 2
Baptized:
Died: 1898 - Gilmanton, Belknap, NH 3
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt 4
Mother: Hannah Fifield 5
Marriage: October 1, 1837 - Gilmanton, Belknap, NH 6
Wife Elizabeth Swett 7
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Joseph Leavitt
Born: September 12, 1765 - Buxton York Maine
Baptized:
Died: - Acton York Maine
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Marriage: 1784 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Joseph Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Joseph Leavitt
Born: - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 25, 1792 - Deerfield Rockingham New Hampshire
Buried: August 1792 - Deerfield Rockingham New Hampshire
AFN: 3MKJ-ZC
Father: Moses Leavitt
Mother: Dorothy Dudley
Marriage: 1727 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife Mary Wadleigh
Born: May 7, 1702 - Deerfield Franklin New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1767 - Deerfield Franklin New Hampshire
Buried: 1767
AFN: 3MKK-0H
Father: Jonathan Wadleigh
Mother: Hannah Weare
Children
1 M Nathaniel Leavitt
Born: December 27, 1727 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: February 18, 1824 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried: February 1824 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
AFN: 298KKR
Spouse: Lydia I Sanborn
Marr: 1756 - Rockingham New Hampshire
2 M Jonathan Leavitt
Born: May 19, 1730 - Brentwood Twp Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized: August 15, 1730
Died: May 13, 1824 - Northfield Merrimack New Hampshire
Buried: - Hodgdon Cem Northfield Merrimack, New Hampshire
AFN: 3MKL-96
3 M Weare Leavitt
Born: August 6, 1732 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: May 22, 1829 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-CJ
4 M Joseph Leavitt
Born: April 25, 1733 - Gilmanton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: September 1, 1818 - Gilmanton Belknap New Hampshire
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-BC
5 M Joshua Leavitt
Born: 1735 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-DP
6 M Moses Leavitt
Born: September 11, 1736 - Brentwood Twp Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1803
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-FV
7 M Dudley Leavitt
Born: 1738 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
8 F Mary Leavitt
Born: June 9, 1739 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1766
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-JD
Spouse: Josiah Fogg
9 M Wadleigh Leavitt
Born: 1742 - Deerfield Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-H7
General Notes: Husband - Joseph Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Mary Wadleigh
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Nathaniel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Jonathan Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Weare Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Joseph Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Joshua Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Dudley Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Wadleigh Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Joshua Leavitt
Born: January 30, 1758 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Salem, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Deborah Fearing
Marriage:
Other Spouse: Deborah
Wife Eunice Richardson
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M William Leavitt
Born: April 15, 1801 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 2, 1883 - Salem, Massachusetts
Buried:
Husband Josiah Leavitt
Born: January 23, 1815 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: April 25, 1895
Buried:
Father: Josiah Leavitt
Mother: Susannah J. Cobb
Marriage: August 10, 1885 - Concord New Hampshire
Other Spouse: Mary Abbott - June 2, 1839 - Grafton New Hampshire
Wife Elizabeth Y. Webber
Born: 1819 - Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Josiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Elizabeth Y. Webber
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Josiah Leavitt 8
Born: May 4, 1653 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts 8
Baptized: May 8, 1653 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Died: September 14, 1708 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts 8
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Marriage: October 20, 1676 - Plymouth Massachusetts
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Josiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Josiah Leavitt 8
Born: May 4, 1653 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts 8
Baptized: May 8, 1653 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Died: September 14, 1708 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts 8
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Marriage: October 20, 1676 - Plymouth Massachusetts 8
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Josiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Justin M. Leavitt
Born: April 7, 1846 - Limington, York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: April 30, 1931
Buried:
Father: Alvah Leavitt
Mother: Margaret Mcarthur Libby
Marriage: November 23, 1875 - York Co, ME
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Justin M. Leavitt
Occupation: Mail Agent, Living in Buxton, ME in 1880 Census.
Husband Randy Smith
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Owen C. Arey
Mother: Barbara K. Smith
Marriage:
Wife Kristen Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Richard L. Leavitt
Mother: Linda M. Monaco
Children
1 F McKena Smith
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
General Notes: Child - McKena Smith
McKena is one year old today, April 6th. Her parents are Kristen and Randy Smith. Her grandparents are Rick and Linda Leavitt; Owen Arey and the late Barbara Arey. Her great-grandmother is Doreen Monaco.
Husband Laurel James Leavitt
Born: September 20, 1923
Baptized:
Died: January 28, 1996 - Millinocket, ME
Buried:
Father: Fremont B. Leavitt
Mother: Evelyn Susan Robinson
Marriage: April 17, 1944
Wife Josephine O. Osborne
Born: May 16, 1926 - Millinocket, ME
Baptized:
Died: July 3, 2007 - Millinocket, ME
Buried:
Father: Albert J. Osborne
Mother: Aldea M. Bilodeau
Children
1 F Linda L. Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Ben Nadeau
2 M Terrance P. Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Anne
3 M Richard L. Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Linda M. Monaco
General Notes: Wife - Josephine O. Osborne
MILLINOCKET -- Josephine O. (Osborne) Leavitt, 81, wife of the late Laurel J. Leavitt, passed away Tuesday, July 3, 2007, at Katahdin Nursing Home, Millinocket, where she had been a resident for the past 16 years. She was born May 16, 1926, in Millinocket, the daughter of Albert J. and Aldea M. (Bilodeau) Osborne.
Jo was a lifelong resident of Millinocket. She was employed for 26 years as a CNA at Millinocket Regional Hospital, work-ing most of those years in the nursery. She loved her babies and saw many of them grow up to have families of their own. In later years, she worked as a ward clerk at the hospital until her retirement in 1985. She will be remembered fondly by her co-workers for her huge smile and fast moving feet. She was best known for skipping up and down the halls of Millinocket Regional Hospital and singing on the 3-11 shift. She loved life, children and the elderly. Grammie "Jo" was especially proud of her children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren and all that they have accomplished. Jo was a member of the American Legion Auxiliary, the Daughters of Isabella, Little Flower Circle, and the VFW Auxiliary.
She is survived by her children: Linda L. Nadeau and her husband, Ben, Terrance P. Leavitt and his wife, Anne, and Richard L. Leavitt and his wife, Linda M., all of Millinocket; her grandchildren: Michael B. Nadeau of Waterville, Janel M. Duplisea of Millinocket, Paul J. Leavitt and Stacey J. Pike of Massachusetts, Hope E. Charette of Millinocket, Kristen L. Smith of Bangor, and James J. Leavitt of Millinocket; her great-grandchildren: Corbin M. Nadeau of Waterville, Bradley S. Duplisea of Millinocket, McKenna B. Smith of Bangor, and Matthew J. Pike of Massachusetts; a brother, Laurier Osborne of Florida; a stepbrother, Morris Fitzgerald of Millinocket; a special aunt and uncle, Theresa and Kenneth Osborne of East Millinocket; and many nieces, nephews and cousins.
In addition to her beloved husband, she was predeceased by her parents; sisters, Leola, Yvette and Irene; and a brother, Arthur.
"I am free, free to be me...I can dance again, laugh again, I can live again. Do not cry for me, but smile for me. I will be smi-ling for you in everything you do. Don't cry for me, but smile for me...until we meet again." Friends are invited to visit with the family 6-9 p.m. Friday at Bouchard - Lamson Funeral Home, 11 Tamarack St., Millinocket. A Mass of Christian burial will be celebrated 10 a.m. Saturday, July 7, at St. Martin of Tours Catholic Church, 112 Maine Ave., Millinocket, with the Rev. Joel Cyr, pastor, presider. Interment will be at Millinocket Cemetery. Gifts in memory of Jo may be sent to Katahdin Nursing Home, 22 Walnut St., Millinocket, ME 04462. Condolences to the family may be expressed at
Husband Ben Nadeau
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Linda L. Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Laurel James Leavitt
Mother: Josephine O. Osborne
Children
Husband Llewelyn Leavitt
Born: 1881 - Perham Aroostook Maine
Baptized:
Died: July 9, 1917
Buried:
Father: Wentworth C. Leavitt
Mother: Li Ie Bean
Marriage: 1906 - Washington Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Llewelyn Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Llewelyn Leavitt
Born: 1881 - Perham Aroostook Maine
Baptized:
Died: July 9, 1917
Buried:
Father: Wentworth C. Leavitt
Mother: Li Ie Bean
Marriage: 1916 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Llewelyn Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Louisa Cora Leavitt
Born: August 18, 1839 - Mattamiscontis, ME
Baptized:
Died: February 2, 1907 - Brownville Junction, ME
Buried:
Father: William Henry Harrison Leavitt
Mother: Martha Ann Melvin
Other Spouse: Samuel L. Clark
Children
General Notes: Wife - Louisa Cora Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Lucinda Leavitt
Born: February 16, 1805 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Benjamin Leavitt
Mother: Susannah Bradbury
Children
General Notes: Wife - Lucinda Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Lucy Leavitt
Born: 1885 - Washington Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Wentworth C. Leavitt
Mother: Li Ie Bean
Children
General Notes: Wife - Lucy Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Lucy A. Leavitt
Born: February 9, 1831 - Exeter, Rockingham Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: June 24, 1877
Buried:
Father: William Phillip Leavitt
Mother: Lucy Libby
Children
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Lydia Leavitt
Born: August 5, 1668 - Hampton Twp Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 16, 1751
Buried:
Father: Hezron Levet
Mother: Martha Taylor
Children
General Notes: Wife - Lydia Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband George Markie
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Margaret Jayne Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Harry Leon Leavitt
Mother: Grace Prudy Bragg
Children
1 M Leon George Markie
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 M Harry William Markie
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Daniel A. Twist
Born: August 1847
Baptized:
Died: 1929
Buried:
Father: Daniel Twist
Mother: Margaret Beatham 9 10
Marriage:
Other Spouse: Ann Patterson
Wife Martha Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Thomas Frank Leavitt
Mother: Rebecca Archer
Children
1 M William Harrison Harry Twist
AKA: Harry
Born: February 1879
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: May Forrest
2 M Ralph C. Twist
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Annie Belle Thompson
3 M Lester Ellsworth Twist
Born: October 4, 1883 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died: October 15, 1974 - Medway, ME
Buried:
Spouse: Etta Bell Clark
Marr: October 5, 1908
General Notes: Husband - Daniel A. Twist
conflicting birth date, could be 1848.
General Notes: Child - William Harrison Harry Twist
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Martha Ann Leavitt
Born: November 12, 1866 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Baptized:
Died: March 23, 1906
Buried:
Father: William Henry Harrison Leavitt
Mother: Martha Ann Melvin
Children
General Notes: Wife - Martha Ann Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Martha C. Leavitt
Born: December 11, 1833 - Unity, Waldo Co, ME
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Jacob Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Sally Waterhouse
Children
Husband Martin Leavitt
Born: March 2, 1825 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: April 2, 1877 - Melrose, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Martin Lincoln Leavitt
Mother: Tirzah Pratt Thomas
Marriage:
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Frank Martin Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Martin Lincoln Leavitt
Born: July 9, 1793 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: June 2, 1868 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilbert
Marriage:
Other Spouse: Lydia Jones
Wife Tirzah Pratt Thomas
Born: 1794 - Weymouth, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: December 1832 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Children
1 M Joshua Leavitt
Born: October 1, 1815 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: February 5, 1872 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Almira Humphrey
Marr: May 23, 1838 - Hingham, Massachusetts
2 M William Leavitt
Born: September 9, 1817
Baptized:
Died: - Boston, Massachusetts
Buried:
3 M David Leavitt
Born: February 8, 1820 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: April 10, 1876 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Martha Ann Davis
4 M Rufus Leavitt
Born: June 22, 1822 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 M Martin Leavitt
Born: March 2, 1825 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: April 2, 1877 - Melrose, Massachusetts
Buried:
6 M Thomas Leavitt
Born: October 12, 1827 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Boston, Massachusetts
Buried:
7 F Hannah Leavitt
Born: April 11, 1830 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Israel Whitcomb
Marr: October 12, 1853 - Hingham, Massachusetts
8 M Albert Leavitt
Born: November 11, 1832 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Boston, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Abigail James Foster
Marr: November 15, 1860 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Husband William Stowell Whiton
Born: October 28, 1834 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: October 28, 1857 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: July 7, 1838 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Evalina Jones
Children
1 F Li Ie Thomas Whiton
Born: 1858
Baptized:
Died: November 18, 1861
Buried:
Husband Jesse Sprague
Born: January 14, 1770 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 12, 1812 - At Sea
Buried:
Father: Jesse Sprague
Mother: Elizabeth Joy
Marriage: January 14, 1798 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: April 25, 1769 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: February 18, 1835 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Deborah Fearing
Children
1 M Leavitt Sprague
Born: December 4, 1799 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 18, 1875 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
2 F Mary Sprague
Born: December 4, 1801 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: February 27, 1885 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
3 F Nancy Sprague
Born: October 22, 1803 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 5, 1879 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Hawkes Jacob
Marr: November 15, 1829 - Hingham, Massachusetts
4 F Deborah Sprague
Born: May 26, 1806 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: October 2, 1806 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
5 F Deborah Fearing Sprague
Born: June 26, 1808 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: December 28, 1851 - Buffalo, New York
Buried:
Spouse: Charles T. Rand
Marr: August 10, 1825 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Death Notes: Wife - Mary Leavitt
Y
Death Notes: Child - Mary Sprague
Husband Joseph Thaxter
Born: August 22, 1723 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: October 12, 1808 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Marriage: December 8, 1742 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: August 3, 1724 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 30, 1790 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Hezekiah Leavitt
Mother: Mary Beal
Children
1 M Joseph Thaxter
Born: April 23, 1744 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 18, 1827 - Edgartown, Massachusetts
Buried:
2 M Leavitt Thaxter
Born: - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: June 6, 1752 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
3 M Joshua Thaxter
Born: August 1747 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 21, 1747 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
4 M Joshua Thaxter
Born: - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 1827 - Portland, Maine
Buried:
Spouse: Mary Hersey
Marr: May 12, 1769
5 M Caleb Thaxter
Born: April 18, 1751 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: November 12, 1828 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
6 F Mary Thaxter
Born: April 8, 1753 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: April 1753 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
7 M Leavitt Thaxter
Born: September 28, 1754 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
8 F Mary Thaxter
Born: October 6, 1756 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 1, 1834 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: William Tidmarsh
Marr: November 19, 1781 - Hingham, Massachusetts
9 F Hannah Thaxter
Born: September 20, 1759 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: June 12, 1781 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
10 F Sarah Thaxter
Born: November 30, 1761 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: May 23, 1842 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: David Andrews
Marr: December 6, 1781 - Hingham, Massachusetts
11 F Chloe Thaxter
Born: September 15, 1765 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: October 8, 1765 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Husband John White
Born: 1597 - Messing, Essex, England
Baptized:
Died: - Hartford, Connecticut
Buried:
Father: Robert White
Mother: Bridget Allgar
Marriage: December 26, 1632 - Messing, Essex, England
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died: - Hartford, Connecticut
Buried:
Children
1 M Daniel White
Born: 1639 - Hartford, Connecticut
Baptized:
Died: July 27, 1713
Buried:
Spouse: Sarah Crow
Marr: November 1, 1661 - Hartford, Connecticut
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: October 20, 1679 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: September 24, 1747 - North Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Buried:
Father: Hezron Levet
Mother: Martha Taylor
Children
General Notes: Wife - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Joseph Moody
Born: 1721 - Kingston, Rockingham, NH 11
Baptized:
Died: 1760 - Exeter, Rockingham, NH
Buried:
Father: Clement Moody
Mother: Elizabeth Scribner
Marriage: November 24, 1742 - Kingston, Rockingham, NH 11 12
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: 1720 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire 13
Baptized:
Died: 1762 - Brentwood Rockingham New Hampshire 13
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother:
Children
1 M Capt. Clement Moody
Born: 1746 - Stowe, Chittenden, VT 14 15
Baptized:
Died: November 4, 1831 - Stowe, Chittenden, VT 16
Buried: - Old Yard Cemetery, Stowe, Chittenden, VT
Spouse: Mary Smith
General Notes: Wife - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Capt. Clement Moody
Capt. Clement Moody was a great-great-grandson of The Immigrant, John Scriven.
He served in the Massabesick (Waterborough, Maine) Militia in the Revolutionary War.
In making reference to Clement's wife, Mary, the CENTER CEMETERY RECORD BOOK (Stowe Town Clerk) says "Clem's wife." The record of her death also states "probably the wife of Capt. Moody."
"A search of the records in the Registry of deeds at Alfred reveals that Clement Moody of Stow, then in the County of Chittenden, [now County of Lamoille] Vt., found his way into town and being satisfied that there was an opportunity for a 'living' purchased from James Barnes December 28, 1795, from John Wheelwright April 28, 1801 and from John Smith February 13, 1802 tracts of land which, included this pond, and contained more than 300 acres. The record of these conveyances is found in Volume 68 at Pages 194, 195 and 196.
This John Smith was the first settler in town.
That Clement Moody had a large family is indicated by the abundance of stone walls that yet remain and the record of vital statistics which show:
Elizabeth Moody married Joseph Pike, Jr. Dec. 20, 1787; Sarah Moody
married Edward Scribner, Jr. 19 November, 1789; Clement Moody, Jr.
married Mehetable Scribner Jan. 1, 1794. Lois m. John Pike April 7,
1796. Records of the following generation show that Moody Pike m.
Sally Fisk Jan. 1, 1816."
"And This Is The Why Of It: Moody and Bartlett Ponds,"
Ernest G. Knights, WATERBORO, YORK COUNTY, MAINE
1768-1955 [Published for the author, 1955]. Unpaginated.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: June 12, 1661 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Baptized: June 23, 1661 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Died: 1706
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Children
General Notes: Wife - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Mary Leavitt
Born: June 12, 1661 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Baptized: June 23, 1661 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Died: 1706
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Children
General Notes: Wife - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Hiram Hobbs Thompson
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: February 4, 1873
Wife Mary Ann Leavitt
Born: August 18, 1852 - York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: January 9, 1933
Buried:
Father: Washington Leavitt
Mother: Susan Hanscom
Children
1 F Abbie Tanton Thompson
Born: September 22, 1875 - York, York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: March 28, 1950
Buried:
Husband Josiah Libby
Born: February 9, 1799 - Porter, Oxford Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: October 1866 - Lawrence, Essex Co, MA
Buried:
Father: Simeon Libby
Mother: Hannah Knowles
Marriage: 1825
Wife Mary P. Leavitt
Born: 1805 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: June 29, 1856 - Lowell, Middlesex Co, MA
Buried:
Children
1 M Leavitt J. Libby
Born: July 21, 1826 - Brownfield, Oxford Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: 1881
Buried:
Spouse: Elizabeth B. Hires
Marr: 1852 - Philadelphia, Montgomery Co, PA
2 M Oscar F. Libby
Born: February 19, 1828 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: 1881
Buried:
Spouse: Lucinda Gilman
Marr: 1852 - Lowell, Middlesex Co, MA
3 F Mary E. Libby
Born: January 19, 1830 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: James M. Currier
Marr: May 15, 1848 - Lawrence, Essex Co, MA
4 M Eben L. Libby
Born: January 29, 1833 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: 1881
Buried:
5 F Ellen S. Libby
Born: March 20, 1834 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: 1881
Buried:
Spouse: Edwin Lyford
Marr: July 11, 1856
6 F Harriet A. Libby
Born: April 16, 1836 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Stephen Kenney
Marr: September 1855
7 F Lucy A. Libby
Born: September 11, 1838 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Joseph Abbott
Marr: July 3, 1857
8 F Francena A. Libby
Born: July 11, 1840 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Rufus Franklin Sargent
Marr: May 6, 1865
9 M Leroy N. Libby
Born: September 29, 1848 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - Josiah Libby
Source: C. T. Libby, Vol I, pg. 284
General Notes: Wife - Mary P. Leavitt
Father: Jonathan Leavitt b: 15 Mar 1759 in Exeter, NH
Mother: Elizabeth Hutchins b: 1774 in/of Carroll NH
Death Notes: Child - Mary E. Libby
Y
General Notes: Child - Mary E. Libby
Widowed, Living with sons in Lawrence, MA in 1880 Census.
Death Notes: Child - Harriet A. Libby
Y
Death Notes: Child - Lucy A. Libby
Y
Death Notes: Child - Francena A. Libby
Y
Death Notes: Child - Leroy N. Libby
Husband Captain Robert Rowe Sr.
Born:
Baptized:
Died: February 21, 1761 17
Buried:
Marriage: December 19, 1707 - Hampton, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 18 19 20 21
Other Spouse: Apphia Shaw 17 - Hampton, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 22
Noted events in his life were:
1. Residence 18 - Hampton, Rockingham, NH U. S. A.
Wife Mehitable Leavitt
Born: June 8, 1682 - Hampton, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 18
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Joseph Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 M Jonathan Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 M Moses Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
4 M Jeremiah Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 M Josiah Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
6 F Jane Rowe
Born: December 9, 1717 - Hampton Falls, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 23
Baptized:
Died: - Hampton, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 23
Buried:
Spouse: Captain Jonathan Swett
Marr: October 26, 1738 - Hampton Falls, Rockingham, NH U. S. A. 23 24
7 M Benjamin Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
8 F Ruth Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
9 F Elizabeth Rowe
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - Captain Robert Rowe Sr.
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Wife - Mehitable Leavitt
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
Notes: Marriage
from TORREY:
ROWE, Robert & Mehitable LEAVITT (1682-); by 1701?, 19 Dec 1707; ?Hampton
General Notes: Child - Joseph Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Jonathan Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Moses Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Jeremiah Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Josiah Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Jane Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Benjamin Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Ruth Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
General Notes: Child - Elizabeth Rowe
Information collected by Patrick McDonald <patrick@mpx.com.au>
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Melinda Leavitt
Born: November 24, 1806 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died: November 3, 1861
Buried:
Father: Benjamin Leavitt
Mother: Susannah Bradbury
Children
General Notes: Wife - Melinda Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Mercy Leavitt
Born: 1686 - Plymouth Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Nehemiah Leavitt
Mother: Alice Cartee
Children
General Notes: Wife - Mercy Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Mercy Leavitt
Born: 1798 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Benjamin Leavitt
Mother: Susannah Bradbury
Children
General Notes: Wife - Mercy Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Nathan Rice
Born: 1753 - Sturbridge, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: April 17, 1834 - Burlington, Vermont
Buried:
Marriage: February 12, 1781 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Meriel Leavitt
Born: February 28, 1758 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: January 7, 1790 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Elisha Leavitt
Mother: Ruth Marsh
Children
1 M Charles Rice
Born: November 28, 1781 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: August 17, 1799 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
2 F Sally Rice
Born: September 16, 1783 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 M Caleb Rice
Born: December 2, 1784 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 17, 1848 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
4 F Priscilla Rice
Born: June 7, 1786 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 M Meriel Rice
Born: July 8, 1788 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Boston, Massachusetts
Buried:
6 M Nathan Rice
Born: December 26, 1789 - Boston, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Elizabeth Norton Lincoln
Marr: May 28, 1817
Husband Moses Leavitt
Born: 1838 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Almira Humphrey
Marriage: November 25, 1867
Wife Mary Farnsworth Marsh
Born: May 7, 1845
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Ernest Howard Leavitt
Born: October 25, 1868 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 F Mabel Weston Leavitt
Born: September 14, 1870 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 F Carrie Parker Leavitt
Born: October 22, 1872 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
4 F Ellen Leavitt
Born: January 6, 1876 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 M Harold Gilbert Leavitt
Born: August 7, 1877 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
6 M Samuel Marsh Leavitt
Born: July 10, 1879 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Moses Leavitt
Born: March 25, 1735 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1803
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother:
Marriage: 1755 - Belknap New Hampshire
Wife Abigail Sanborn
Born: March 25, 1735 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Jeremiah Sanborn
Mother: Lydia Dearborn
Children
1 M John Leavitt
Born: 1755 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1812
Buried:
2 M Moses Leavitt
Born: 1756 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1826
Buried:
3 F Ruth Leavitt
Born: January 22, 1757 - Sanbarton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: November 26, 1803
Buried:
Spouse: Moses Leavitt
Marr: December 29, 1780 - Rockingham New Hampshire
4 F Sarah Leavitt
Born: 1759 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 F Mary Leavitt
Born: 1761 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
6 F Lydia Leavitt
Born: 1763 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
7 M Jeremiah Leavitt
Born: 1765 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
8 F Abigail Leavitt
Born: April 15, 1767 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: February 28, 1847
Buried: - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Spouse: Moses Leavitt
Marr: 1804 - Belknap New Hampshire
General Notes: Husband - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Abigail Sanborn
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - John Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Ruth Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Lydia Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Jeremiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Abigail Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Moses Leavitt
Born: - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Hezron Levet
Mother: Martha Taylor
Marriage: December 11, 1700 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Moses Leavitt
Born: July 12, 1759 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: October 3, 1827 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Buried: - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Father: Nathaniel Leavitt
Mother: Lydia I Sanborn
Marriage: December 29, 1780 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Other Spouse: Abigail Leavitt - 1804 - Belknap New Hampshire
Wife Ruth Leavitt
Born: January 22, 1757 - Sanbarton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: November 26, 1803
Buried:
Father: Moses Leavitt
Mother: Abigail Sanborn
Children
1 F Abigail Leavitt
Born: March 1, 1781 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: April 12, 1862 - Derby Orleans Vermont
Buried:
2 M Josiah Leavitt
Born: March 14, 1783 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 30, 1863 - Hooksett Merrimack New Hampshire
Buried: - Sanbarton Bay Belknap New Hampshire
Spouse: Susannah J. Cobb
Marr: August 8, 1804 - Rockingham New Hampshire
3 F Lydia Leavitt
Born: October 6, 1785 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: January 5, 1850
Buried:
4 F Miriam Leavitt
Born: January 22, 1788 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 31, 1841
Buried:
5 F Mary Leavitt
Born: August 12, 1791 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 28, 1865
Buried:
6 F Sarah Leavitt
Born: April 30, 1794 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: August 18, 1875
Buried: - Atwater Dodge Wisconsin
7 M Moses Leavitt
Born: April 15, 1798 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: February 14, 1830
Buried:
8 F Leavitt
Born: 1801 - Sanbarton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried: January 15, 1805
9 M John Sanborn Leavitt
Born: November 22, 1803 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: June 4, 1864
Buried: - Sanbornton Bay Belknap New Hampshire
General Notes: Husband - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Ruth Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Abigail Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Josiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Lydia Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Miriam Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - John Sanborn Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Moses Waterhouse Leavitt
Born: January 4, 1818 - Unity, Waldo Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: November 8, 1867 - Chicago, Cook Co, IL
Buried:
Father: Jacob Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Sally Waterhouse
Marriage: October 29, 1842 - Hallowell, Kennebec Co, ME
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Moses Waterhouse Leavitt
Husband Nathaniel Leavitt
Born: December 27, 1727 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: February 18, 1824 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried: February 1824 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
AFN: 298KKR
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Mary Wadleigh
Marriage: 1756 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife Lydia I Sanborn
Born: - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: October 30, 1827 - Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried: October 1827
AFN: 298KLX
Father: Jeremiah Sanborn
Mother: Lydia Dearborn
Children
1 M Joseph Leavitt
Born: November 30, 1755 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized: November 30, 1755 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Died: November 25, 1840 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Buried: - Leavitt Cemetery Sanbornton Belknap, New Hampshire
2 F Lydia Leavitt
Born: December 5, 1757 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: October 3, 1827
Buried:
AFN: 3MKK-ZH
3 M Moses Leavitt
Born: July 12, 1759 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: October 3, 1827 - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Buried: - Sanbornton Belknap New Hampshire
Spouse: Ruth Leavitt
Marr: December 29, 1780 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Spouse: Abigail Leavitt
Marr: 1804 - Belknap New Hampshire
4 M Jeremiah Leavitt
Born: July 10, 1760 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1817 - Hatley Stansted Quebec, Canada
Buried: - Hatley Stanstead Quebec, Canada
AFN: 1B3P-0W
5 M Nathaniel Leavitt
Born: July 10, 1764 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: July 15, 1856 - Pomfret Windsor Vermont
Buried:
6 M Dudley Leavitt
Born: March 25, 1767 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: December 29, 1839 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried:
7 M John Leavitt
Born: December 5, 1769 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: October 30, 1854 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried: - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
AFN: 3MKL-35
8 M Josiah Leavitt
Born: 1772 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1865 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-4B
9 M Jonathan Leavitt
Born: 1773 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: March 9, 1842 - Compton Compton Quebec, Canada
Buried: - Hatley Stanstead Quebec, Canada, East Hill Cem
AFN: 3MKL-5H
10 M Stephen Leavitt
Born: 1775 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: 1776
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-6N
11 F Mary Leavitt
Born: March 17, 1776 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: September 17, 1858
Buried:
12 F Hannah Leavitt
Born: 1777 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: January 26, 1839 - Grantham Sullivan New Hampshire
Buried:
AFN: 3MKL-81
General Notes: Husband - Nathaniel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Lydia I Sanborn
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Joseph Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Lydia Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Moses Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Jeremiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Nathaniel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Dudley Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - John Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Josiah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Jonathan Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Stephen Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Hannah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Nehemiah Leavitt
Born: 1805 - Montville Waldo Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joseph P. Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth
Marriage: 1830 - Piscataquis Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Nehemiah Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Nehemiah Leavitt
Born: 1752 - Raymond Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: February 23, 1829 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Buried:
Father: Nehemiah Leavitt
Mother: Sarah
Marriage: March 8, 1777 - Chichester Merrimack New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Nehemiah Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Nehemiah Leavitt
Born: November 21, 1721 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: 1771 - Cohassett, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Elisha Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Lane
Marriage: April 24, 1746 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Martha Lincoln
Born: May 13, 1721 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 F Sarah Leavitt
Born: December 10, 1746 - Cohassett, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: January 31, 1827 - Cohassett, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Timothy Burr
Marr: September 11, 1765 - Cohassett, Massachusetts
2 F Elizabeth Leavitt
Born: April 2, 1751 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: May 2, 1807
Buried:
Spouse: Daniel Macleod
Marr: December 16, 1776
Husband O. H. Leavitt
Born: 1845 - Turner, Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: May 27, 1871 - Livermore, Maine
Wife Hester Ann Rogers Richardson
Born: January 17, 1847 - Turner, Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Phineas Richardson
Mother: Prudence G. Page
Children
Husband Odber Josiah Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Harry Leon Leavitt
Mother: Grace Prudy Bragg
Marriage:
Wife Gladys M. Springer
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 F Gayleen Grace Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 F Theresa Marie Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Ebenezer Lincoln
Born: February 21, 1762 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: November 8, 1841 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Marriage: November 24, 1805 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Olive Leavitt
Born: November 27, 1761 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: February 15, 1837 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Deborah Fearing
Other Spouse: Thomas Burr - November 13, 1794 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Children
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Pamelia Ida Leavitt
Born: June 1849 - York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Alvah Leavitt
Mother: Margaret Mcarthur Libby
Children
Husband Atwood Levensaler
Born: April 10, 1911 - Washington, District Of Columbia, USA
Baptized:
Died: February 6, 1994
Buried:
Father: Alfred W. Levensaler
Mother: Mary Williams
Marriage: August 23, 1941 - Hartford, Connecticut
Noted events in his life were:
1. Military - Pacific Arena
Wife Pauline Leavitt
Born: December 29, 1913 - Canann, New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Archie D. Sanborn
Born: 1904
Baptized:
Died: July 8, 1982
Buried: - Howland, ME
Marriage:
Wife Pauline M. Leavitt
Born: July 4, 1904 - Howland, ME
Baptized:
Died: November 17, 1991
Buried: - Howland, ME
Father: Walter R. Leavitt
Mother: Maude S. Colbath
Children
Husband Percival Leavitt
Born: 1580 - Beverly, Yorkshire, England
Baptized:
Died: - Hingham, Norfolk, England
Buried:
Father: Percival Levett Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth Rotherforth
Marriage: 1605 - Yorkshire England
Wife Margaret Linkley
Born: 1589 - Beverly, Yorkshire, England
Baptized:
Died: 1606 - Beverly, Yorkshire, England
Buried:
Children
1 M John Leavitt
Born: - Dorchester, England
Baptized:
Died: November 20, 1691 - Hingham, Norfolk, England
Buried:
Spouse: Sarah Gilman
2 M John Leavitt
Born: - Beverly, Yorkshire, England
Baptized:
Died: November 20, 1691 - Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts
Buried: - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Spouse: Sarah Gilman
Marr: December 16, 1646 - Hingham, Plymouth, MA
Spouse: Mary Lovitt
Marr: 1635 - Massachusetts
3 M Joseph Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
4 F Sarah Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
5 F Elizabeth Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
6 M Benjamin Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
7 M Samuel Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
8 F Abigail Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
9 F Mary Leavitt
Born: - York Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
10 F Martha Leavitt
Born: - Beverly Yorkshire England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - Percival Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Wife - Margaret Linkley
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Notes: Marriage
_STATMARRIED
General Notes: Child - John Leavitt
Name Prefix:<NPFX> Deacon
General Notes: Child - John Leavitt
This is a database made possible through many contributors. When I began my family search, I only knew the names of my grand parents. Thanks to you, the world is a little smaller and our family is much larger.
BIRT: ROLE CHIL @E8453@
Married on BEF 1637
Married on 16 DEC 1646
DEAT: ROLE DEAD @E8454@
ADDR: NAME John Leavitt
General Notes: Child - Joseph Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Sarah Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Elizabeth Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Benjamin Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Samuel Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Abigail Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Martha Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Josiah Libby
Born: November 16, 1806 - Saco, York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: July 8, 1866 - Biddeford, York Co, ME
Buried:
Father: John Libby
Mother: Drusilla Graffam
Marriage: March 3, 1833
Wife Phebe L. Leavitt
Born: July 30, 1806 - Minot, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: June 5, 1880
Buried:
Children
1 M George Parcher Libby
Born: January 27, 1834 - Greene, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: October 31, 1855 - No Children
Buried:
Spouse: Andelusia C. Gould
Marr: December 7, 1853
2 F Lovina Leavitt Libby
Born: October 2, 1835 - Monmouth/Wales, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: January 5, 1842
Buried:
3 M Elias Graffam Libby
Born: June 20, 1837 - Leeds, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: January 6, 1842
Buried:
4 F Eunice Parcher Monroe Libby
Born: August 18, 1839 - Leeds, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: July 7, 1927 - Portland, Cumberland Co, ME
Buried:
Spouse: William Mchard Lowell
Marr: January 29, 1862
5 F Lovina Leavitt Libby
Born: June 18, 1842 - Greene, Androscoggin Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: September 6, 1853
Buried:
General Notes: Wife - Phebe L. Leavitt
!Father: Jacob Leavitt; Mother: Rhoda Thayer
General Notes: Child - George Parcher Libby
Occupation: Shoemaker and Mill Operater.
Husband Phillip Ansley Leavitt
Born: August 3, 1879 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Thomas Frank Leavitt
Mother: Rebecca Archer
Marriage:
Wife Lucretia Isabelle Reardon
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Robert Reardon
Mother: Lucretia Julia Clifford
Children
Husband Luther Sprague
Born: 1795 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized: April 19, 1795 - Hingham, Mass.
Died: March 12, 1868 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Josiah Sprague
Mother: Susa Whiton
Marriage: January 10, 1819 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Noted events in his life were:
1. Occupation, Blacksmith
Wife Polly Leavitt
Born: March 13, 1797 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: June 1, 1868 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Jerom Leavitt
Mother: Sally Lincoln
Children
1 M Luther Sprague
Born: May 13, 1821 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Helen Maria Churchill
Marr: February 10, 1858 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Spouse: Lucy Whiton
Marr: May 28, 1848 - Hingham, Massachusetts
2 M Edwin Sprague
Born: August 13, 1823 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: August 31, 1842 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
3 M James Sprague
Born: January 2, 1826 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 8, 1826 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
4 F Sarah Lincoln Sprague
Born: October 10, 1827 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Thomas Jones
Marr: May 29, 1864 - Hingham, Massachusetts
5 M Timothy Sprague
Born: May 10, 1830 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: March 2, 1889
Buried:
Spouse: Annie McVey
Marr: May 28, 1887 - Boston, MA
Spouse: Harriet M. Newhall
6 M Artemas Sprague
Born: March 10, 1833 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Juliette Amelia Dawes
Marr: February 26, 1860 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Spouse: Eliza Melissa Josephine French
Marr: December 6, 1865 - Weymouth, MA
7 F Mary Leavitt Sprague
Born: July 30, 1835 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Ezra Leonidas Bicknell
Marr: April 26, 1855 - Hingham, Massachusetts
8 M Leavitt Sprague
Born: December 5, 1838 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Hannah Vinal Burbank
Marr: November 25, 1868 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Death Notes: Child - Luther Sprague
Y
Death Notes: Child - Sarah Lincoln Sprague
Y
Death Notes: Child - Timothy Sprague
Y
Death Notes: Child - Artemas Sprague
Y
Death Notes: Child - Mary Leavitt Sprague
Y
Death Notes: Child - Leavitt Sprague
Husband Ralph Jefferson Leavitt
Born: May 4, 1877 - York, York Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: February 22, 1932
Buried:
Father: Daniel H. Leavitt
Mother: Mary E. Raitt
Marriage: October 9, 1897
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Richard L. Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Laurel James Leavitt
Mother: Josephine O. Osborne
Marriage:
Wife Linda M. Monaco
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Restant Percy Peck Monaco
Mother: Doreen M. Higgins
Children
1 F Kristen Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Randy Smith
Husband Jack Schulman
Born: - Germany
Baptized:
Died: October 25, 2005 - Cathedral City, CA
Buried:
Father: Leopold Schulman
Mother: Charlotte
Marriage: 1943
Wife Ruth Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died: 1988
Buried:
Father: Alton Leroy Roy Leavitt
Mother: Evelyn Lovejoy
Children
General Notes: Husband - Jack Schulman
Founder and Director, American Branch of Cambridge University Press
Jack Schulman
SCHULMAN-Jack, 90. Founder and Director, American Branch of Cambridge University Press. Jack Schulman, died peacefully at his home in Cathedral City, CA. on October 25, 2005. Mr. Schulman, born in Germany, came to America when he was 10 years old. After receiving his B.B.A. from St. John's University, his M.B.A. from New York University and his M.A. from Cambridge University, Mr. Schulman began his publishing career at Macmillan where he met his wife to be, Ruth Leavitt, of Alton, ME. They were wed in 1943 while he was serving in the United States Air Corps. Ruth died in 1988. In 1949, Jack helped found the American branch of Cambridge University Press and became a Director in 1970. After retiring in 1976, Mr. Schulman served on the Management Boards of the University Presses of Cambridge, Yale, M.I.T., Oklahoma and the Beacon Press, the publishing arm of the Unitarian Church. He was a member of the Honor Society of Delta Mu Delta and a nonresident Fellow of Cambridge University, Christ College, U.C. Berkeley and Yale University. Jack was highly respected by his peers, his friends, and deeply loved by his entire family, providing wisdom and inspiration to all. He is survived by his loving sisters, Paula Lucks of Sherman Oaks, CA. and Hilda Milstein of Manalapan, NJ, his devoted sister-in-law, Catherine Leavitt of Eddington, ME and his brother-in-law and sister-in-law, Donald and Ruth Leavitt of Old Town, ME. Uncle Jack will be missed by his adoring nieces and nephews across the United States, Morton Trachtenbroit, Linda Lucks, Charles Milstein, Irv Lucks, Ed Lucks, Dianne Tencer, Sandi Cooper, Karla Toledano, Margaret Evelyn Davis, Mark Leavitt, Karen Curtis, Dorothy Jane Sawyer, Leigh Caron, Nancy Harris, and their families. Jack is also survived by his loving caretaker, Joyce Molina and his close companion of many years, Marilyn Milman. He was preceded in death by his parents Leopold and Charlotte Schulman, his siblings Leo Schulman, Adele Trachtenbroit, Sylvia Sloves and Hannah Schulman. Donations may be made in Jack's memory to: The Braille Institute, 70-251 Ramon Road, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. Memorial services in Palm Springs, CA are pending. Non-denominational graveside services 11 AM November 12 at the Alton Methodist Church, 3494 Bennoch Road, Alton, ME.
Published in the New York Times on 10/30/2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Husband Benjamin Thomas
Born: February 9, 1799 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: February 25, 1854 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Marriage: February 19, 1837 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Sally Loring Leavitt
Born: January 16, 1803 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: June 15, 1889
Buried:
Father: Jerom Leavitt
Mother: Sally Lincoln
Children
1 M George Thomas
Born: November 2, 1841 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Mary Ann Loring
Marr: September 29, 1870 - Hingham, Massachusetts
2 M William Henry Thomas
Born: June 12, 1845 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Mary Whiting Higgins
Marr: October 30, 1867 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: November 13, 1770 - Poplin Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: December 18, 1852
Buried:
Father: Stephen Leavitt
Mother: Mary Roberts
Marriage: November 26, 1789 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: November 13, 1770 - Poplin Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: December 18, 1852
Buried:
Father: Stephen Leavitt
Mother: Mary Roberts
Marriage: 1833 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: March 18, 1770 - Buxton York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Marriage: January 24, 1791 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: March 18, 1770 - Buxton York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Marriage: 1803 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: March 18, 1770 - Buxton York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Marriage: February 11, 1811 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: October 10, 1730 - York York Maine
Baptized:
Died: September 1797
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Bethia Bragdon
Marriage: January 1, 1756 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: October 10, 1730 - York York Maine
Baptized:
Died: September 1797
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Bethia Bragdon
Marriage: October 6, 1793 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: September 4, 1706 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: January 16, 1776
Buried:
Father: Thomas Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth Atkinson
Marriage: October 29, 1730 - Kennebec Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born: September 4, 1706 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: January 16, 1776
Buried:
Father: Thomas Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth Atkinson
Marriage: January 6, 1775 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel Leavitt
Born:
Baptized: April 7, 1641 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Died: August 6, 1707 - Exeter Rockingham New Hampshire
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Mary Lovitt
Marriage: 1664 - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Samuel A. Leavitt
Born: April 13, 1862 - Dover Piscataquis Maine
Baptized:
Died: February 20, 1925 - Readfield Kennebec Maine
Buried:
Father: William B. Leavitt
Mother: Abbie A. Strout
Marriage: November 18, 1888 - Victoria New Brunswick Canada
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Samuel A. Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Daniel Wildes
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: February 16, 1854 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: April 19, 1831 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 29, 1888
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Evalina Jones
Children
Husband Josiah Sprague
Born: May 21, 1834 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: June 7, 1883
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: 1846 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Almira Humphrey
Children
1 F Myra Ellen Sprague
Born: July 27, 1887 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Josiah Sprague
Born: May 21, 1834 - Hingham, MA
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Daniel Sprague
Mother: Tamar Stodder
Marriage: June 7, 1883
Other Spouse: Adrianna Lincoln - November 16, 1858 - Boston, MA
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 F Myra Ellen Sprague
Born: July 27, 1887 - Hingham, MA
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Death Notes: Husband - Josiah Sprague
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: 1683 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Hezron Levet
Mother: Martha Taylor
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: - York York Maine
Baptized:
Died: September 4, 1834 - Fairfield Somerset Maine
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Bethia Bragdon
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: March 9, 1809 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Benjamin Leavitt
Mother: Susannah Bradbury
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: 1708 - Hampton Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Thomas Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth Atkinson
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: April 8, 1764 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died: March 20, 1800
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: May 29, 1726 - Framingham Middlesex Massachusetts
Buried:
AFN: G4DB-8Q
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Sarah Leavitt
Born: - Hingham Plymouth Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: May 29, 1726 - Framingham Middlesex Massachusetts
Buried:
AFN: G4DB-8Q
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Gilman
Children
General Notes: Wife - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Sealey Leavitt
Born: October 18, 1694 - Exeter, Rockingham, New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: July 1748 - Exeter, Rockingham, New Hampshire
Buried:
Father: Nehemiah Leavitt
Mother: Alice Cartee
Marriage: 1716 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Other Spouse: Sarah Brown
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Sealey Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband David Stodder
Born: October 17, 1741 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Winchendon, Massachusetts
Buried:
Marriage: December 10, 1764
Wife Sibyl Leavitt
Born: 1742 - Cohassett, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: - Winchendon, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Abraham Leavitt
Mother: Joanna Leavitt
Children
1 M Abraham Leavitt Stodder
Born: August 5, 1767 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 F Joanna Stodder
Born: August 3, 1769 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 F Sybil Stodder
Born: January 20, 1772 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Stephen Leavitt
Born: September 18, 1772 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: April 15, 1858 - Sutton Brome Quebec Canada
Buried:
Father: Stephen Leavitt
Mother: Mary Roberts
Marriage: April 1795 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Stephen Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Stephen Leavitt
Born: - Montville Waldo Maine
Baptized:
Died: 1881
Buried:
Father: Joseph P. Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth
Marriage: September 17, 1816 - Waldo Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Stephen Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Stephen Leavitt
Born: 1745 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Nehemiah Leavitt
Mother: Sarah
Marriage: 1769 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Wife Mary Roberts
Born: 1733 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Other Spouse: Thomas Dolloff - 1758 - Rockingham New Hampshire
Children
1 M Joseph P. Leavitt
Born: 1775 - Poplin Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Elizabeth
Marr: 1795 - New Hampshire
2 M Samuel Leavitt
Born: November 13, 1770 - Poplin Rockingham New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: December 18, 1852
Buried:
3 M Stephen Leavitt
Born: September 18, 1772 - Meredith Belknap New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: April 15, 1858 - Sutton Brome Quebec Canada
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - Stephen Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Wife - Mary Roberts
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Joseph P. Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Samuel Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Stephen Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Isaiah Wilder
Born: May 20, 1757 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 2, 1843 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Marriage: October 7, 1779 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Susa Leavitt
Born: January 9, 1760 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: March 9, 1840 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Father: Joshua Leavitt
Mother: Deborah Fearing
Children
1 F Susa Wilder
Born: February 26, 1780 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: May 14, 1857 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Elpalet Loring
Marr: May 12, 1799 - Hingham, Massachusetts
2 M Isaiah Wilder
Born: March 23, 1782 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: October 11, 1867 - Keene, New Hampshire
Buried:
3 F Hannah Wilder
Born: February 1, 1784 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: July 3, 1788 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
4 F Lydia Wilder
Born: August 30, 1786 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: December 4, 1866 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Daniel Stodder
Marr: November 27, 1808 - Hingham, Massachusetts
5 F Hannah Wilder
Born: September 26, 1789 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Leavitt Gill
Marr: January 23, 1810 - Hingham, Massachusetts
6 F Caroline Wilder
Born: April 3, 1803 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: September 13, 1847 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Spouse: Amos Binney
Marr: July 14, 1824 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Husband Theodore Leavitt
Born: September 11, 1902 - Howland, ME
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Walter R. Leavitt
Mother: Maude S. Colbath
Marriage:
Wife Cora Mills
Born: November 1, 1902
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Thomas Leavitt
Born: January 14, 1767 - Standish Cumberland Maine
Baptized:
Died: December 24, 1846
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Bradbury
Marriage: September 2, 1790 - York Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Thomas Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Thomas Leavitt
Born: - Hampton, Rockingham Co., NH
Baptized:
Died: November 16, 1761 - Hampton, Rockingham Co., NH
Buried:
Father: Aretas Leavitt
Mother: Ruth Sleeper
Marriage: November 24, 1714 - Hampton, Rockingham Co., NH
Noted events in his life were:
1. Alt. Birth - Hampton Falls, Rockingham Co., NH
Wife Elizabeth Locke
Born: 1694 - Hampton, Rockingham, New Hampshire
Baptized:
Died: July 11, 1776 - Hampton Falls, Rockingham, New Hampshire
Buried:
Father: Nathaniel Locke
Mother: Dorothy Blake
Noted events in her life were:
1. Alt. Death - Hampton Falls, Rockingham Co., NH
Children
1 F Mercy Leavitt
Born: October 14, 1716 - Hampton Falls, Rockingham Co., NH
Baptized:
Died: 1794 - New Gloucester, Cumberland Co., ME
Buried:
Spouse: Job Haskell
Marr: Hampton Falls, Rockingham Co., NH
General Notes: Child - Mercy Leavitt
Marcia Leavitt
Marcy Leavitt
Mary Leavitt
Mercy Leavitt's given name is variously recorded as Mercy or Mary or Marcy. It is assumed that Mercy (Leavitt) Haskell died in New Gloucester, ME, because that is where she and her husband were living at the time of her death.
Husband Thomas Franklin Leavitt
Born: September 13, 1846 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died: August 3, 1908 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Buried:
Father: William Henry Harrison Leavitt
Mother: Martha Ann Melvin
Marriage: 1861 - Waldo Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - Thomas Franklin Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband Thomas J. Leavitt
Born: October 19, 1823 - Unity, Waldo Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: February 23, 1898
Buried:
Father: Jacob Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Sally Waterhouse
Marriage: December 9, 1858 - Champaign, Champaign Co, IL
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Thomas J. Leavitt
Born: October 19, 1823 - Unity, Waldo Co, ME
Baptized:
Died: February 23, 1898
Buried:
Father: Jacob Leavitt
Mother: Sarah Sally Waterhouse
Marriage: June 2, 1892 - Waldo, Waldo Co, ME
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Husband Thomas Jones Leavitt
Born: May 24, 1829 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: John Leavitt
Mother: Evalina Jones
Marriage: March 21, 1852 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Wife Mary Vinal Stodder
Born: December 6, 1833 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Charles Thomas Leavitt
Born: July 21, 1857 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Julia Elizabeth Cushing
Marr: February 12, 1880 - Hingham, Massachusetts
2 F Lilla M. Leavitt
Born: May 8, 1864 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Baptized:
Died: October 23, 1882 - Hingham, Massachusetts
Buried:
Husband True Leavitt
Born: October 7, 1779 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died: 1826
Buried:
Father: Joseph Leavitt
Mother: Anna French
Marriage: 1805 - Cumberland Maine
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
General Notes: Husband - True Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband Edward W. Townsend
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Vivien Rosalda Leavitt
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Harry Leon Leavitt
Mother: Grace Prudy Bragg
Children
1 F Grace Elizabeth Townsend
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband William Leavitt
Born: 1424 - Normanton, Yorks, Eng.
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Elizabeth Sywara
Born: 1422 - Normanton, Yorks, Eng.
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M William Levitt Leavitt
Born: 1448 - Bolton Percy, Yorkshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Constantia Wickersley
2 M Robert Levett
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 F Elizabeth Levett
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband William B. Leavitt
Born: 1821 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: John A. Leavitt
Mother: Hazeltine
Marriage: 1845 - Washington Maine
Wife Abbie A. Strout
Born: 1825 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Wentworth C. Leavitt
Born: February 26, 1852 - Woodland Washington Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Lida Kidney
Marr: September 11, 1893 - Washington Maine
Spouse: Li Ie Bean
Marr: 1877 - York Maine
2 F Sarah Leavitt
Born: 1854 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
3 M Calvin Leavitt
Born: 1856 - York Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
4 M Samuel A. Leavitt
Born: April 13, 1862 - Dover Piscataquis Maine
Baptized:
Died: February 20, 1925 - Readfield Kennebec Maine
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - William B. Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Wife - Abbie A. Strout
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Wentworth C. Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Sarah Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Calvin Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
General Notes: Child - Samuel A. Leavitt
I exchange data with people who have a interlocking marriage
into any surnames that interlocks into any of the branches
of my families.I started when I was 10 years old now 68years.
I am sharing my data in the interest of collaborative research.
I do this to help people to find there lineages and to fill
the pedigree charts.
I have not personally researched all families listed; dates
and information are subject to verification. Not responsible
for typographical errors misplaced citations. Missing
sources/references are because of my learning curve,not my
intention. You are encouraged to seek further documention
for your own confirmation.Further I have no control what
other people include about their families in any of the
data that they exchange.
If there are no dates about the living, then the computers
can not determine if the person is alive or deceased.
The sites set the living anywhere from 75 to 100 years
depending on the laws of the countries that they are in.
When I exchange with lineages the living are sometime shown
depending on who you are exchanging with, but my
request is that,if you update any of my data to the
internet, you also set the do not show the living,before
you update to the internet.
Also place in the source your contact email
address,and the lineage, so people can contact you
reqarding your update.
I have no claim to owning the data, except that which is
my immediate lineage, and even that is worked on by many
members of my family lineages. It is only as good as what
people put into it,that exchange with me. So look
in the notes of the genealogy for origin, if they put it
there,or the source.
If you are going to correct,update or put new branches on the
lineage your are inquirying about,please do not add from what
I have sent you,(This just duplicates how many more people
I have to find in the duplicates and merge them,edit your
notes to ensure that there is nothing there that you do not
want published.
Also do not submit information on copyrights that invades the
privacy of others especially for a relative that has not given
you permission to publish same.
Remember nothing is carved in stone except time.
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriages, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 631,749 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Husband William Henry Harrison Leavitt
Born: October 29, 1815 - Montville Waldo Maine
Baptized:
Died: May 1888 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Buried:
Father: Joseph P. Leavitt
Mother: Elizabeth
Marriage: 1836 - Waldo Maine
Wife Martha Ann Melvin
Born: July 16, 1815 - Unity Waldo Maine
Baptized:
Died: June 9, 1874
Buried:
Children
1 F Louisa Cora Leavitt
Born: August 18, 1839 - Mattamiscontis, ME
Baptized:
Died: February 2, 1907 - Brownville Junction, ME
Buried:
Spouse: Samuel L. Clark
2 M Thomas Frank Leavitt
Born: September 23, 1845 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died: August 3, 1908 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Buried:
Spouse: Rebecca Archer
3 M Charles Leavitt
Born: 1840 - Waldo Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
4 M Thomas Franklin Leavitt
Born: September 13, 1846 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died: August 3, 1908 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Buried:
5 M Charles Harrison Leavitt
Born: December 29, 1847 - Medway, ME
Baptized:
Died: August 5, 1925
Buried:
Spouse: Almeda C. Hughes
Marr: 1872 - Penobscot Maine
6 F Martha Leavitt
Born: 1849 - Penobscot Maine
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
7 F Martha Ann Leavitt
Born: November 12, 1866 - Pattagumpus Penobscot Maine
Baptized:
Died: March 23, 1906
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - William Henry Harrison Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Wife - Martha Ann Melvin
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Louisa Cora Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Charles Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Thomas Franklin Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Charles Harrison Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Martha Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
General Notes: Child - Martha Ann Leavitt
The best way for me to describe the relationship, is for
example if you have 6,000 people in your data base
that are connected via interlocking marriges, and
you find that you have a marriage that is interlocked into
one of my people in my data base, then they are related
via interlocking marriages, does not matter how distant.
The difference here is that the interlocking into my data
base would link to over 724,091 people via interlocking
marriages.
My hobby is working on interlocking marriages,to any
family surname that is in my data,and I exchange with
people to find them,and to assist them in finding lineage
that link into their families.
Otto Palfenier
Husband William Phillip Leavitt
Born: January 18, 1803 - Exeter, Rockingham Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: August 4, 1881
Buried:
Marriage: October 13, 1829 - Limington, York Co, ME
Wife Lucy Libby
Born: July 10, 1809 - Conway, Carroll Co, NH
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Philemon Libby
Mother: Liberty Norris
Children
1 F Lucy A. Leavitt
Born: February 9, 1831 - Exeter, Rockingham Co, NH
Baptized:
Died: June 24, 1877
Buried:
General Notes: Husband - William Phillip Leavitt
!Living with 2 sons, William P. Leavitt b: abt 1837 in NH, and Charles E.
Leavitt b: abt 1847 in NH, and their families, in Boston, Suffolk Co, MA in
1880 Census
!Father: Reuben Leavitt; Mother: Elizabeth Brown
!Children - Source: Alan Lundstadt
Husband Edmund Needham 25 26 27
Born: 1603 - Hampstead, County Middlesex, England
Baptized:
Died: May 16 - Lynn, MA
Buried:
Father: John Needham 25
Mother: Mary 25
Father: John Needham 25 26
Mother: Mary 25 26
Father: John Needham 25 27
Mother: Mary 25 27
Father: John Needham 25 27
Mother: Mary 25 27
Marriage:
Wife Joan Leazing 25 26 27
Born: 1610
Baptized:
Died: October 24, 1675 - Lynn, MA
Buried:
Father: Thomas Leazing 25
Mother: Joan 25
Father: Thomas Leazing 25 26
Mother: Joan 25 26
Father: Thomas Leazing 25 27
Mother: Joan 25 27
Father: Thomas Leazing 25 27
Mother: Joan 25 27
Children
1 M Daniel Needham 25 26 27
Born: 1638 - Lynn, MA
Baptized:
Died: November 1717 - Lynn, MA
Buried:
Spouse: Ruth Chadwell 25 26 27
General Notes: Husband - Edmund Needham
1 _UID 4B1B9D2D4FF33F4DB6FFB9403D799E8E8EDC
General Notes: Wife - Joan Leazing
1 _UID 7BD4E9EF0CB42D4C96D831D4A9B1F0264356
Notes: Marriage
_STATMARRIED
General Notes: Child - Daniel Needham
1 _UID FC1DFC401A758846AE4C87C90A57293AC0D4
Husband Adam Lebanastre Le Banastre 26 27
Born: 1179
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Other Spouse: Unknown - 1224 - England
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Thomas Lebanastre Banastre 26 27
Born: 1246
Baptized:
Died: 1272
Buried:
Spouse: Eleanor De Beetham 26 27
Marr: 1254 - England 26 27
General Notes: Husband - Adam Lebanastre Le Banastre
1 _UID D1EDB87617175B459F989E84B0A8F86CCF89
Notes: Marriage
1 _UID 98511703B9C7E74F928F8C0F22E75C09E3B8
General Notes: Child - Thomas Lebanastre Banastre
1 _UID 5C8E88FA84FE7647B2B3F498A94E70C5C8C1
Husband Thurston Lebanastre
Born: - Banastre Normandy France
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Richard De Banastre
Born: - Banastre Normandy France
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband William Lebarker
Born: 1294 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Randulph Lebarker
Mother: Margaret Pigot
Marriage:
Wife Lebarker
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Roger Lebarker
Born: 1322 - Warfield, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Alice Lebarker
Husband William Lebarker
Born: 1216 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Richard Lebarker
Mother: Lebarker
Marriage:
Wife Lebarker
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Randulph Lebarker
Born: 1240 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Margaret Pigot
Husband Richard Lebarker
Born: 1194 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Lebarker
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M William Lebarker
Born: 1216 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Lebarker
Husband Roger Lebarker
Born: 1322 - Warfield, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: William Lebarker
Mother: Lebarker
Marriage:
Wife Alice Lebarker
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M William Barker
Born: 1349 - Warfield, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died: 1411 - Hallon, Shropshire, England
Buried:
Spouse: Margery Wharwood
Marr: 1370 - Hallon, Shropshire, England
Husband Randulph Lebarker
Born: 1240 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: William Lebarker
Mother: Lebarker
Marriage:
Wife Margaret Pigot
Born: 1258
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M William Lebarker
Born: 1294 - Calverhall, Shropshire, England
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Lebarker
Husband Jacques Lebaron
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: - St-Vincent-DE-Rouen, Normandie, Seine-Maritime, France
Wife Francoise Quibel
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 F Barbe Baron
Born: 1652 - St-Vincent-DE-Rouen, Normandie, Seine-Maritime, France
Baptized:
Died: - Québec, Qc
Buried: - Notre-Dame-DE-Québec, Qc
Spouse: Simon Chevreux Lataupine
Marr: November 3, 1667 - Notre-Dame-DE-Québec, Qc
Spouse: Jean Merienne Lasolaye
Marr: May 2, 1672 - Notre-Dame-DE-Québec, Qc
Spouse: Guillaume Duboc St Godard
Marr: April 23, 1691 - Notre-Dame-DE-Québec, Qc
Husband Jean Baptiste Theriault
Born: 1736 - Cobequid, Truro, Nouvelle-Écosse, Canada
Baptized:
Died: October 14, 1815 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Buried:
Father: Charles Theriault
Mother: Angelique Doiron
Marriage: October 1, 1769 - Cherbourg, Manche, Normandie, France
Wife Marie Madeleine Charlotte Lebaron
Born:
Baptized:
Died: 1812 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Buried:
Children
1 M Francois Theriault
Born: June 6, 1784 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Baptized:
Died: October 16, 1845 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Buried:
Spouse: Marie Houde
Marr: January 7, 1811 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Spouse: Marie Germain Belisle
Marr: February 2, 1807 - St-Jacques-DE-L'achigan, Cté Montcalm, Qc
Husband Lebarre
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage:
Wife Voisine
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Norman Voisine
Mother: Doris Daigle
Children
1 F Lebarre
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
2 F Lebarre
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband James B. Lebarron
Born: 1855 - Westmeath Township, Renfrew Co, ON
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: February 19, 1902 - Renfrew Co, ON
Wife Jessie Wallace
AKA: Jessie Lebarron
Born: April 9, 1879 - Bagot, Renfrew Co, ON
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: James Wallace
Mother: Elizabeth McNiven
Children
Husband Jean Lemonnier
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Marriage: - Ste-Anne, Villebaudon, Manche, France
Wife Marie Lebas
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
1 M Francois Joachim Lemonier Monier
Born: 1712 - Ste-Anne, Villebaudon, Manche, France
Baptized: December 15, 1712 - Ste-Anne, Villebaudon, Manche, France
Died:
Buried:
Spouse: Therese Beland
Marr: April 29, 1743 - St-François-DE-Sales, Neuville, Cté Portneuf, Qc
Spouse: Marie Anne Aide Crequis
Marr: January 19, 1761 - St-François-DE-Sales, Neuville, Cté Portneuf, Qc
Death Notes: Child - Francois Joachim Lemonier Monier
Husband Louis Thomas Beaulieu
Born: - Québec, Qc
Baptized: - Notre-Dame-DE-Québec, Qc
Died:
Buried:
Father: Louis Thomas Beaulieu
Mother: Jeanne Labrecque
Marriage: October 4, 1790 - Montréal, Qc
Other Spouse: Genevieve Amable Gaulin - May 13, 1754 - St-François-DE-Sales, Ile-Jésus, Laval, Qc
Wife Marie Amable Lebeau
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children
Death Notes: Husband - Louis Thomas Beaulieu
Husband Mathurin Lebeau Lalouette
Born: April 30, 1684 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Baptized: July 2, 1684 - Ste-Trinité-DE-Contrecoeur, Cté Verchères, Qc
Died: January 11, 1757 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Buried: January 11, 1757 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Father: Jean Bau Lebeau Laviolette
Mother: Etiennette Antoinette Loret Lory
Marriage: October 30, 1708 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Other Spouse: Marie Lesueur - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Wife Catherine Noelle Martinbeau
Born: December 25, 1689 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Baptized: December 25, 1689 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Died: May 28, 1711 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Buried: May 29, 1711 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Father: Jacques Martin
Mother: Helene Valiquet
Children
Husband Mathurin Lebeau Lalouette
Born: April 30, 1684 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Baptized: July 2, 1684 - Ste-Trinité-DE-Contrecoeur, Cté Verchères, Qc
Died: January 11, 1757 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Buried: January 11, 1757 - St-Joseph-DE-Chambly, Qc
Father: Jean Bau Lebeau Laviolette
Mother: Etiennette Antoinette Loret Lory
Marriage: - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Other Spouse: Catherine Noelle Martinbeau - October 30, 1708 - Ste-Famille-DE-Boucherville, Qc
Wife Marie Lesueur
Born: April 21, 1696 - Montréal, Qc
Baptized: April 21, 1696 - Notre-Dame-DE-Montréal, Qc
Died:
Buried:
Father: Pierre Charles Lesueur
Mother: Marie Drouet Grandmaison
Children
Death Notes: Wife - Marie Lesueur
Husband Lebel
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Jacques Lebel
Mother: Soucy
Marriage:
Wife Theriault
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Albert Theriault
Mother: Ouellet
Children
1 M Lebel
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Husband Lebel
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Father: Lebel
Mother: Beaupre
Marriage:
Wife Therrien
Born:
Baptized:
Died:
Buried:
Children